Drill guide preparation with the aid of a temporary; Bone augmentation using a bone block graft; Implant insertion; Augmentation of gingival margin with a soft tissue graft from the roof of the mouth; Preparation of tooth replacements according to esthetic criteria, in some cases, as all-ceramic crowns.

Contents: - Implant planning and positioning - Preparation - Drilling and thread-cutting - Implant insertion - Wound closure Synopsis: The implant position is determined using a drill guide/x-ray template (regions 34-32-42-44). A Peeso drill is inserted in the drill guide and used to mark the position in the mucoperiosteum. An incision is made, and the mucoperiosteum is displaced. The implant insertion sites are prepared by using a 2 mm twist drill, 2/3 mm pilot drill, 3 mm and 3/5 mm twist drills. This is followed by counter-drilling and thread-cutting. The implants were loaded at 40-50 N. The wound is then closed using GORE-TEX® suture material.

Unlike bone, which undergoes remodeling by resorption followed by bone apposition, teeth are not subject to physiological remodeling. They are remarkably resistant to physiological remodeling processes. The reason for this is found in the periodontium and cementum. The mechanisms that take effect in this area and the effectiveness of the periodontal system - consisting of gingiva, alveolar bone, periodontium and cementum - after injuries will be visualized in the new scientific 3D film, "Periodontal Regeneration".The visualization of these complex processes is of great interest for academic teaching as well as for the clinician and general practitioner as the cellular interactions are presented in the context of four phases. For the first time scanning electron microscopic images of real cells will be visualized allowing the comparison of their characteristics with computer animated simulations. DVD 1: Expert Version approx. 14 minutes DVD 2: Public Version approx. 13 minutes Outline: - Cementum formation - Orthodontic tooth movement - Trauma and periodontitis - Periodontal regeneration

Objectives: To demonstrate that dynamic guided surgery is as predictable as conventional surgery.
Methods: Partially edentulous patients requiring a fixed rehabilitation were selected for this pilot study. No specific contraindications were established, and smokers were not excluded. An impression was taken pre-operatively using an irreversible hydrocolloid (Cavex CA37®) to fabricate a diagnostic cast for moulding the surgical stent (NaviStent®). Afterwards, a standard cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan was made with the NaviStent® in place using a Planmeca Promax 3-D Max®. Images were converted into DICOM files and transformed into a 3-D virtual model using the Navident® software. The potential implant locations were planned in a prosthesis-driven way. For preparing the osteotomy, the drilling axis of the handpiece and the twist drills were calibrated. The osteotomies were prepared at low speed using a high level of cooling. The navigation software guided the drilling procedure in real time. Before installing implants, an extra calibration procedure was performed for tracking the implant. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the clinical outcome up to 12 months post-operatively for implants installed using the Navident® guided surgery system.
Results: Partially edentulous men (n = 6) and women (n = 7) were included in this pilot study (mean age 52.15 years; range 20–75). Out of these 13 patients, two were current smokers of more than 10 cigarettes per day. Twenty implants were inserted. No mechanical or biological complications occurred during the surgical procedure, and no major complaints were reported, such as hemorrhage, sinus pathology or severe post-operative pain. No implants were lost up to 1 year after insertion, resulting in 100% implant survival.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this pilot study, real-time navigation is a promising technique. However, there is not yet enough evidence to show that the method is as safe and predictable as conventional implant surgery.

Objectives: To evaluate the use of an allograft cellular matrix containing live stem cells for maxillary sinus and ridge augmentations.
Methods: Maxillary sinus and ridge augmentations were performed using an allograft cellular matrix containing live stem cells. The post-operative results were evaluated by CT scans and peri-apical radiographs. Sinus augmentation was evaluated after 10 weeks. Radiographic bone tomography was similar to that of the native bone and the ridge augmentation resulted in a vertical ridge augmentation of 3–4mm. The cellular matrix was supplied by Brockton, MA and processed by AlloSource, Centennial, CO.
Results: Following healing and approximately 10 weeks following surgery, an additional CT scan was taken. This showed that the native and augmented bone was of an adequate width for supporting an implant. Radiography revealed that the augmented bone had a similar texture to native bone, indicating formation of mature bone. The scan also revealed downward growth of the bone in a vertical direction, overlapping the crest of the native pre-maxillary bone. This was not attempted during the surgical procedure, and was a particular cause for concern.
Conclusions: This use of allograft mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to be a reliable method for ridge augmentation, especially in the vertical direction in areas of severe ridge atrophy. Further studies are needed to support this finding in a more guided manner, especially for vertical ridge augmentation.